When Robert Thompson was only ten years old, he abducted and tortured two-year-old James Bulger.
On his recognizance, the child murderer was released from the young offenders’ institute in 2001.
Table of Contents
Are You Familiar With Robert Thompson’s Name Or Present Location?
On August 23, 1982, Robert Thompson was born as the fourth of seven children.
His father left the family five years before Bulger’s murder, leaving his mom Ann distraught.
Overdosing on booze, she attempted to kill herself after becoming sad and feeling suicidal.
Before murdering James Bulger, the two-year-old did not have a rap sheet.
As part of a two-part broadcast, Bbc 5’s Lost Boy: A Death of James Bulger includes an interview with Thompson in which the 10 was portrayed as “street smart,” “intelligent,” and “tried very hard to mislead me.”
During questioning, Thompson “would weep anytime there was an awkward situation,” another investigator said.
On parole at the age of 18, the 36-year-old man was released and has never been arrested again.
You might find yourself in jail if you try to find out how he lives. An international injunction protects his identity.
James Bulger’s Murderer Revealed His Homosexuality When?
Sources in 2006 said that Thompson would be in a long-term homosexual relationship at the age of 23 and that he had assimilated well into his North West neighborhood.
Do You Think Robert Thompson Was Responsible For The Murder?
At 6 a.m. on February 13, 1993, Detective Phil Robert of Merseyside’s serious crime team opened an inquiry into the abduction of a two-year-old boy from the Independent Contractor Shopping Centre in Bootle.
After interviewing Thompson and Jon Venables, Phil said, “I addressed evil head on that day, 20 years ago.”
But Thompson was in charge, and both men went for James, despite that fact.
A match was created in hell. You won’t find anything like this anywhere else. I think they have gone out that day intending to murder. If they hadn’t been apprehended, they would have had the opportunity to strike once again.
This is what I think, and I’m sticking to it.
At his trial in 1993, Thomson was portrayed as Venables’s go-to guy for advice and guidance.
Sir Michael Rutter, a leading child psychiatrist, described the dangers associated with Venables’ release from jail in 2000 as “minor.”
The release of Venables in 2010 showed that Thompson had thrived at the Barton Moss secure facility in Eccles, Lancs, exhibiting a developing interest and skill in the visual arts.
His academic achievements included five GCSEs and two A-levels and happy recollections of trips to the Lake District as Stratford-upon-Avon, where he had the opportunity to see the play.
“Common knowledge” about Venable’s death and life may be obtained online.
To safeguard Venables from “death,” Sir Andrew McFarlane said the Family Division’s President had rejected the application.
The petitioners, whom he expressed his warmest sympathy, had nothing to do with this judgment.
According to reality, there isn’t enough evidence to justify altering the injunction.
And he added: “As Lady Elisabeth Butler-Sloss has observed, (Venables’) distinctive reputation and individuality may have harmful and even deadly implications.'” He was “unique in his renown,” which would lead to “grave and maybe lethal repercussions,”
By looking at what we knew in 2019, it seems that (Venables) faces an ongoing danger of significant injury, making her situation an outlier.